Bug bounty platforms: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank bug bounty platforms by visibility and citations. 16 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Bug bounty platforms used by security teams to run vulnerability disclosure programs, manage researchers, and surface exploitable issues faster. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jun 19, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
HackerOne leads the bug bounty platform category with 87.5% visibility, nearly 25 percentage points ahead of second-ranked Bugcrowd at 75.0%. Both scores represent significant jumps from their previous visibility figures of 50.0% each, meaning the gap between rank one and rank two widened as both rose. The category average sits at just 18.8%, making the top two brands outliers rather than benchmarks. Below rank three, visibility drops sharply, with Synack at 37.5% and YesWeHack at 25.0% trailing the leaders by a large margin.
The most striking pattern in this data is the disconnect between visibility and citation. HackerOne and Bugcrowd, the two most visible brands, both carry 0.0% citation rates. Intigriti at rank three is the only top-five brand with any citations, recording 12.5%. Immunefi, ranked sixth with just 12.5% visibility, also holds a 12.5% citation rate, matching its own visibility score. This means AI surfaces the category leaders by name without linking to their domains, while smaller players like Intigriti and Immunefi earn proportionally stronger source trust.
Google AI Mode is the top engine for every brand in this dataset, indicating the audit captured a single-engine landscape. The cited sources list is dominated by third-party and community platforms: reddit.com, cloudsek.com, trainingcamp.com, youtube.com, vendr.com, and gartner.com all appear alongside intigriti.com and immunefi.com. The presence of both Intigriti and Immunefi as cited sources explains their non-zero citation rates. Neither HackerOne nor Bugcrowd appears in the top cited sources list despite their high visibility, confirming they are named by the AI but not linked as authoritative references.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
HackerOne 50% → 88% · rank #2 → #1+38pp
-
Bugcrowd 50% → 75% · rank #1 → #2+25pp
-
Intigriti 38% → 62% · rank #3 → #3+25pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
hackerone.com
|
88% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
HackerOne leads with 87.5% visibility, nearly 4.7 times the 18.8% category average, but records 0.0% citations, meaning it is named without being sourced. |
||||
| 2 |
bugcrowd.com
|
75% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Bugcrowd sits 12.5 percentage points behind HackerOne at 75.0% visibility and also holds 0.0% citations, mirroring the leader's citation gap despite a strong visibility score. |
||||
| 3 |
intigriti.com
|
62% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Intigriti is the only top-five brand with citations at 12.5%, and it also appears directly in the top cited sources list, giving it a source-trust edge over higher-ranked peers. |
||||
| 4 |
synack.com
|
38% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Synack's 37.5% visibility is well above the 18.8% average but trails the top three considerably, and its 0.0% citation rate means it earns no direct source credit from AI responses. |
||||
| 5 |
yeswehack.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
YesWeHack at 25.0% visibility slightly exceeds the 18.8% category average but records 0.0% citations, placing it at the lower boundary of meaningful AI presence in this category. |
||||
| 6 |
immunefi.com
|
12% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
hackenproof.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
openbugbounty.org
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
cobalt.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
safehats.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
yogosha.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
zerocopter.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
federacy.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
hackrate.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
detectify.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
bountyfactory.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on bug bounty platforms, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer.
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence — different from being named.
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps.
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically.
Get your own bug bounty platforms brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about bug bounty platforms AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in the bug bounty platforms category?
HackerOne leads with 87.5% visibility and a composite score of 61.2, well ahead of second-placed Bugcrowd at 75.0% visibility and a composite score of 52.5.
Which bug bounty platforms are actually cited as sources by Google AI Mode?
Only Intigriti and Immunefi appear in the top cited sources list for this category, both recording 12.5% citation rates, while the two most visible brands, HackerOne and Bugcrowd, hold 0.0% citation rates.
What third-party sources does Google AI Mode anchor on when answering bug bounty platform queries?
The top cited sources include reddit.com, cloudsek.com, trainingcamp.com, youtube.com, vendr.com, and gartner.com, indicating community forums, training sites, and analyst platforms carry significant source weight in this category.
How does the category average compare to the top brands?
The category average visibility is just 18.8%, meaning HackerOne at 87.5% and Bugcrowd at 75.0% are extreme outliers, while six of the sixteen brands recorded 0.0% visibility.
Which brands gained the most visibility in the most recent period?
HackerOne gained 37.5 percentage points (from 50.0% to 87.5%), Bugcrowd gained 25.0 points (from 50.0% to 75.0%), and Intigriti gained 25.0 points (from 37.5% to 62.5%), making all three the biggest risers.
Is there a bug bounty brand that punches above its visibility weight in citations?
Immunefi ranks sixth with only 12.5% visibility but achieves a 12.5% citation rate equal to Intigriti, which has 62.5% visibility, suggesting Immunefi's domain carries disproportionate source authority relative to its mention frequency.