Application security posture management platforms: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank application security posture management platforms by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Application security posture management platforms used to unify findings, prioritize exploitable risks, and improve governance across code, pipelines, open source, cloud, and runtime environments. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jun 30, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When AI engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini answer questions about application security posture management platforms, Mend comes up most often, appearing in 37.5% of AI-generated responses across the engines tracked. Cycode and Aikido Security follow as the next most frequently named brands, rounding out the top three across a field of 20 platforms evaluated.
The rankings reflect which sources AI engines trust most when forming answers. The top cited domains include cycode.com, aikido.dev, gartner.com, sentinelone.com, and plexicus.ai. That mix of vendor-owned content and analyst coverage (Gartner in particular) signals that AI engines reward both direct topical authority and third-party validation. Brands that publish detailed, specific content about ASPM and earn coverage from credible analysts show up more consistently in AI responses.
For a buyer using this page to shortlist vendors, the practical takeaway is this: a brand's AI visibility often reflects how well it has established third-party credibility, not just marketing reach. Look for vendors with recent analyst mentions, verified reviews on recognized platforms, and published content that addresses ASPM specifically rather than broad application security. That specificity tends to predict both AI recognition and genuine category depth.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
Mend leads the ASPM category with a visibility score of 37.5%, more than triple the 12.5% shared by Cycode, Aikido Security, and ArmorCode, and far above the category average of 5.0%. This gap is significant because it means Google AI Mode is surfacing Mend unprompted across the broadest range of queries. However, Mend's visibility fell from 50.0% to 37.5% in the latest period, suggesting its dominance is softening even as no single challenger has moved decisively to close the gap.
Cycode presents the sharpest divergence between visibility and citation in the dataset. Its visibility sits at 12.5%, matching several peers, but its citation rate reaches 75.0%, the highest in the category and four times the 18.8% average. Arnica shows an even more extreme case, recording 0.0% visibility alongside a 50.0% citation rate. This pattern indicates Google AI Mode references these brands as trusted sources within answers without consistently naming them as recommended platforms, a meaningful distinction for buyers assessing true AI presence.
Google AI Mode is the dominant engine across all ten ranked brands, with every top brand recording it as their top engine. Among the top cited sources in the category, cycode.com and aikido.dev appear alongside third-party authorities gartner.com and sentinelone.com, as well as smaller specialist domains such as plexicus.ai, legitsecurity.com, arnica.io, and endorlabs.com. This mix suggests AI answers in this category anchor on a combination of vendor-owned content and analyst or adjacent-vendor sources rather than mainstream tech press.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Cycode 0% → 12% · rank #2 → #2+12pp
-
Aikido Security 0% → 12% · rank #7 → #3+12pp
-
ArmorCode 0% → 12% · rank #5 → #5+12pp
Biggest visibility fallers
-
Mend 50% → 38% · rank #1 → #1-12pp
-
Arnica 12% → 0% · rank #3 → #4-12pp
-
GitLab 12% → 0% · rank #9 → #15-12pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
mend.io
|
38% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
Mend holds a visibility score of 37.5%, more than triple the category average of 5.0%, but its citation rate of 25.0% trails Cycode and Arnica significantly. |
||||
| 2 |
cycode.com
|
12% | 75% | Google AI Mode |
Cycode's citation rate of 75.0% is the highest in the category and four times the average, despite its visibility matching peers at just 12.5%. |
||||
| 3 |
aikido.dev
|
12% | 38% | Google AI Mode |
Aikido Security rose four rank positions and gained 12.5 visibility points from zero, while holding its citation rate steady at 37.5%, double the category average. |
||||
| 4 |
arnica.io
|
0% | 50% | Google AI Mode |
Arnica records 0.0% visibility yet achieves a 50.0% citation rate, the second highest in the dataset, indicating AI cites it as a source without surfacing it as a named platform. |
||||
| 5 |
armorcode.com
|
12% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
ArmorCode gained 12.5 visibility points from zero but saw its citation rate fall by 25.0 points, leaving both metrics at 12.5%, exactly at the composite score floor shared with Apiiro and Veracode. |
||||
| 6 |
apiiro.com
|
12% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
veracode.com
|
12% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
ox.security
|
0% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
checkmarx.com
|
0% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
wiz.io
|
0% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
legitsecurity.com
|
0% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
paloaltonetworks.com
|
0% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
jit.io
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
snyk.io
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
gitlab.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
p0.dev
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
aquasec.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
semgrep.dev
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
sonarsource.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
github.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on application security posture management platforms, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Get your own application security posture management platforms brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about application security posture management platforms AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in the application security posture management platforms category?
Mend leads with a visibility score of 37.5%, far above the category average of 5.0% and more than triple the 12.5% recorded by its nearest challengers Cycode, Aikido Security, and ArmorCode.
Which ASPM brand is cited most often by Google AI Mode even when not prominently named?
Cycode holds the highest citation rate at 75.0%, and Arnica reaches 50.0% despite having 0.0% visibility, meaning both are referenced as trusted sources far more often than they are surfaced as named platforms.
What sources does Google AI Mode anchor on when generating ASPM category answers?
The top cited sources include vendor domains cycode.com, aikido.dev, and arnica.io alongside gartner.com, sentinelone.com, plexicus.ai, legitsecurity.com, and endorlabs.com, combining vendor content with analyst and adjacent-vendor material.
Which ASPM brands have shown the most significant recent visibility movement?
Cycode, Aikido Security, and ArmorCode each gained 12.5 visibility points from zero in the latest period, while Mend fell 12.5 points from 50.0% and Arnica dropped entirely to 0.0% visibility.
Is there a meaningful gap between visibility and citation across ASPM platforms?
Yes. The category average citation rate of 18.8% is nearly four times the average visibility of 5.0%, and individual brands like Arnica show extreme divergence with 0.0% visibility but 50.0% citation.
Which AI engine dominates coverage of the ASPM category?
Google AI Mode is the top engine for every one of the ten ranked brands in the dataset, with no other engine recorded as a primary driver of visibility or citation in this category.