Application whitelisting software: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank application whitelisting software by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Application whitelisting tools used to control executable access, reduce malware risk, and enforce trusted software policies across managed devices. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When buyers ask about Application whitelisting software, AI engines frequently mention ThreatLocker as the leading brand, with prominent visibility at 37.5%. Other notable names like Airlock Digital and Ivanti Application Control also appear in the top ranks, showcasing their recognition among AI engines as reliable options in the market.
The rankings are shaped by AI engines pulling information primarily from sources like pcmatic.com, techhq.com, and worldmetrics.org, including Reddit discussions. These sites often act as aggregators or offer reviews, which significantly influence AI engines by contributing current perspectives and user feedback that help establish a brand's reputation and standing.
For buyers evaluating these brands, consider recent reviews and third-party validations that AI engines prioritize, as they can point to a brand's topical authority in Application whitelisting software. Pay attention to how often brands are mentioned and the sources cited, as this reflects their relevance and effectiveness according to AI insights.
At a glance
What we observed in this category
ThreatLocker dominates this category with a visibility score of 37.5%, against a category average of just 1.9%. That gap, over 35 percentage points above average, is the largest concentration of AI visibility among any single brand in the dataset. Its composite score of 26.2 dwarfs the next four ranked brands, each scoring only 3.8. This level of dominance means buyers encountering Google AI Mode responses for application whitelisting queries will most often see only one brand described in detail.
A sharp divergence exists between visibility and citation across ranks 2 to 5. Airlock Digital, Ivanti Application Control, Microsoft AppLocker, and McAfee Application Control each hold 0.0% visibility but 12.5% citation. These brands are being referenced as sources or evidence within AI responses, but not named prominently in AI-generated descriptions. ThreatLocker shows the opposite pattern: 37.5% visibility with 0.0% citation, meaning it is named frequently but not used as a source document by the AI.
All ten ranked brands share Google AI Mode as their top engine, confirming this category's AI visibility is concentrated within a single platform. The top cited sources include pcmatic.com, reddit.com, heimdalsecurity.com, and huntress.com, none of which are vendor domains from the top-ranked brands. This pattern suggests Google AI Mode is drawing on third-party review and commentary sites rather than vendor content when constructing responses about application whitelisting software.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
ThreatLocker 12% → 38% · rank #3 → #1+25pp
Biggest visibility fallers
-
Airlock Digital 12% → 0% · rank #1 → #2-12pp
-
Ivanti Application Control 12% → 0% · rank #5 → #3-12pp
-
ManageEngine Application Control Plus 12% → 0% · rank #2 → #8-12pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
threatlocker.com
|
38% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
ThreatLocker leads with 37.5% visibility and a composite score of 26.2, nearly seven times higher than the four brands ranked directly below it. |
||||
| 2 |
airlockdigital.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Airlock Digital holds 0.0% visibility but 12.5% citation, a reversal from its previous rank-1 position where it held both visibility and citation at 12.5%. |
||||
| 3 |
ivanti.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Ivanti Application Control gained 12.5 citation points this period despite losing 12.5 visibility points, producing a composite score identical to ranks 2, 4, and 5. |
||||
| 4 |
microsoft.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Microsoft AppLocker matches ranks 2, 3, and 5 exactly at 0.0% visibility and 12.5% citation, showing no differentiation from specialist vendors in AI citation frequency. |
||||
| 5 |
trellix.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
McAfee Application Control, now hosted under trellix.com, shares the same 3.8 composite score as three other brands, indicating no AI visibility advantage from brand heritage. |
||||
| 6 |
broadcom.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
checkpoint.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
manageengine.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
faronics.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
citrix.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
vmware.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
drivelock.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
kaspersky.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
sophos.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
vmware.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
paloaltonetworks.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
trendmicro.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
fortinet.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
sentinelone.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
broadcom.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on application whitelisting software, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Get your own application whitelisting software brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about application whitelisting software AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in application whitelisting software?
ThreatLocker leads with 37.5% visibility and a composite score of 26.2, far ahead of the category average of 1.9%. No other brand in the top 10 holds any visibility score above 0.0%.
What sources does Google AI Mode cite most for application whitelisting research?
The top cited sources include pcmatic.com, reddit.com, heimdalsecurity.com, huntress.com, and techhq.com. None of these are the primary domains of the top-ranked vendors in this category.
Which brands are cited by AI but not prominently named in responses?
Airlock Digital, Ivanti Application Control, Microsoft AppLocker, and McAfee Application Control each show 12.5% citation but 0.0% visibility, meaning they appear as referenced sources but not as featured brands.
Has any brand's AI visibility changed significantly in the most recent period?
ThreatLocker rose from 12.5% to 37.5% visibility, a gain of 25 percentage points, while Airlock Digital, Ivanti, and ManageEngine each fell by 12.5 visibility points.
How concentrated is AI visibility across brands in this category?
Visibility is highly concentrated: ThreatLocker holds 37.5% while every other brand in the top 10 sits at 0.0%, against a category average of only 1.9%.
Does brand size or heritage give an advantage in AI citations for this category?
The data does not support that conclusion. Microsoft AppLocker and McAfee Application Control share identical composite scores of 3.8 with smaller specialist vendors Airlock Digital and Ivanti Application Control.