Anti-fraud software: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank anti-fraud software by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Anti-fraud software used to detect suspicious activity, prevent payment and account fraud, score risk, investigate attacks, and protect digital commerce and financial operations. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jul 01, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When AI engines like ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity answer questions about anti-fraud software, Sift comes up most often, appearing in 37.5% of relevant AI responses across the engines we tracked. Fingerprint and Persona round out the top three. If you are shortlisting vendors based on which names buyers encounter during AI-assisted research, those three dominate the conversation right now.
The rankings reflect which sources AI engines pull from most heavily. The top cited domains include g2.com and gartner.com (both aggregator and analyst review sites), alongside more specialized sources like supervizor.com, fraudio.com, and shadowdragon.io. This matters because brands that appear frequently and positively on high-authority review and analyst platforms get surfaced more often, regardless of raw product quality or market share.
For a buyer using this page, the practical takeaway is to check whether a vendor has recent, substantive coverage on the sources AI engines actually cite. A brand with strong Gartner presence or deep G2 review volume will keep appearing in AI answers over time. If a vendor you are considering is absent from those sources, it may be strong on features but invisible in the AI-driven research process most buyers now use.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
Sift leads the anti-fraud software category with a visibility score of 37.5% and a composite score of 33.8, placing it well ahead of the next ranked brands. Fingerprint and Persona both sit at 25% visibility but trail Sift by 12.5 percentage points. The category average visibility is just 5.6%, meaning Sift's score is roughly 6.7 times the average. This concentration at the top suggests AI responses in this category are not distributing attention evenly across the 20 brands tracked.
A clear divergence exists between being named and being cited. Persona ranks third with 25% visibility but holds a 0% citation rate, meaning AI surfaces it without linking to its domain. Fraud.net presents the sharpest contrast in the opposite direction: it carries 0% visibility yet a 25% citation rate, making it the most-cited brand that never appears as a named recommendation. Riskified, SEON, Sardine, and Experian all share the same pattern of zero visibility paired with a 12.5% citation rate.
Google AI Mode is the top engine for every brand in this dataset, with no other engine appearing as a primary driver for any of the 10 ranked brands. Among the top cited sources, Gartner and G2 appear alongside niche or vendor-adjacent domains such as supervizor.com, shadowdragon.io, fraudio.com, trustmi.ai, and microblink.com. This mix suggests AI responses in this category draw on a combination of established review platforms and specialist third-party sites rather than anchoring exclusively on major analyst sources.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Sift 0% → 38% · rank #0 → #1+38pp
-
Fingerprint 0% → 25% · rank #0 → #2+25pp
-
Persona 0% → 25% · rank #0 → #3+25pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
sift.com
|
38% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
Sift leads all 20 brands with 37.5% visibility and 25% citation rate, both well above the 5.6% category average, making it the only brand with strong scores on both dimensions. |
||||
| 2 |
fingerprint.com
|
25% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Fingerprint matches Persona on visibility at 25% but holds a 12.5% citation rate versus Persona's 0%, giving it a higher composite score of 21.2 despite identical visibility. |
||||
| 3 |
withpersona.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Persona reaches 25% visibility, more than four times the 5.6% category average, yet its 0% citation rate signals AI names it in responses without ever linking to its domain. |
||||
| 4 |
forter.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Forter sits at 12.5% visibility and 0% citation, producing a composite score of 8.8, placing it level with Feedzai and well below the top three brands. |
||||
| 5 |
feedzai.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Feedzai shares Forter's composite score of 8.8 with identical visibility and citation figures, suggesting neither brand has differentiated its AI presence from the other at this stage. |
||||
| 6 |
fraud.net
|
0% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
riskified.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
seon.io
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
sardine.ai
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
experian.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
signifyd.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
kount.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
unit21.ai
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
datadome.co
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
arkoselabs.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
bolt.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
ravelin.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
clear.sale
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
risk.lexisnexis.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
accertify.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on anti-fraud software, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Get your own anti-fraud software brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about anti-fraud software AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in anti-fraud software?
Sift leads with 37.5% visibility and a composite score of 33.8, well ahead of Fingerprint and Persona which both sit at 25% visibility.
What is the average AI visibility score for anti-fraud software brands?
The category average is 5.6% for both visibility and citation, meaning the top three brands all exceed the average by a factor of four or more.
Which anti-fraud brands are cited by AI but not named in responses?
Fraud.net has a 25% citation rate with 0% visibility, while Riskified, SEON, Sardine, and Experian each hold a 12.5% citation rate with zero visibility.
Which anti-fraud brands are named in AI responses but not cited?
Persona, Forter, and Feedzai all appear in AI responses with visibility scores above zero, but each carries a 0% citation rate.
What sources does AI cite most for anti-fraud software research?
The top cited sources include Gartner and G2 alongside specialist sites such as supervizor.com, shadowdragon.io, fraudio.com, trustmi.ai, and microblink.com.
Which engine drives AI visibility for anti-fraud software brands?
Google AI Mode is the top engine for all 10 ranked brands in this dataset, with no other engine recorded as a primary driver.