AI voice generators: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank ai voice generators by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. AI voice generation platforms used to create natural-sounding narration, dubbing, synthetic voices, and audio content for media, products, and workflows. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jun 09, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
ElevenLabs dominates the AI voice generators category with a composite score of 42.5, more than double that of second-ranked Speechify (22.5) and over three times the score of third-ranked Murf (12.5). Its visibility score of 50.0% sits 46.2 percentage points above the category average of 3.8%, making it the clear default reference point for Google AI Mode when answering queries in this space. The gap between ElevenLabs and the rest of the field is not marginal — it reflects a structural separation between one dominant brand and a fragmented mid-tier.
Speechify presents the category's sharpest divergence between visibility and citation: a 0.0% visibility score alongside a 75.0% citation rate, the highest citation figure in the dataset. This means Google AI Mode is actively citing speechify.com as a source within AI-generated answers without naming Speechify as a recommended brand. Typecast shows the inverse pattern — 12.5% visibility with 0.0% citation — indicating it is named in responses but its domain is not being used as a reference source. These two cases reveal that named presence and trusted-source status operate as distinct signals in this category.
Google AI Mode is the sole engine recorded across all 20 brands in this audit, confirming the category's AI visibility landscape is currently a single-engine phenomenon. Among the top cited sources, speechify.com leads, followed by google.com, youtube.com, and reddit.com, suggesting Google AI Mode anchors heavily on aggregator and user-generated content platforms alongside brand domains. Third-party review and workflow sites — zapier.com and mashable.com — also appear in the cited sources list, indicating editorial roundups carry significant weight in how AI constructs responses in this category.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
ElevenLabs 0% → 50% · rank #0 → #1+50pp
-
Murf 0% → 12% · rank #0 → #3+12pp
-
Typecast 0% → 12% · rank #0 → #4+12pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
elevenlabs.io
|
50% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
ElevenLabs leads with a 50.0% visibility score — 13x the category average of 3.8% — and a composite score of 42.5, with both visibility and citation deltas rising from zero in the prior period. |
||||
| 2 |
speechify.com
|
0% | 75% | Google AI Mode |
Speechify holds the highest citation rate in the dataset at 75.0% despite a 0.0% visibility score, meaning its domain is cited as a source but it is not named as a recommended brand in AI responses. |
||||
| 3 |
murf.ai
|
12% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Murf sits at rank 3 with equal visibility and citation scores of 12.5%, the only top-5 brand where both metrics are balanced, placing its composite score at 12.5 — exactly the category midpoint among active brands. |
||||
| 4 |
typecast.ai
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Typecast achieves 12.5% visibility but 0.0% citation, indicating AI responses mention it by name without drawing on its domain as a reference source, yielding a composite score of 8.8. |
||||
| 5 |
lovo.ai
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
LOVO mirrors the rank-6 and rank-7 brands with a 0.0% visibility score and 12.5% citation rate, resulting in a composite score of 3.8 — equal to the category average but driven entirely by citation rather than named presence. |
||||
| 6 |
speechmatics.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
deepgram.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
play.ht
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
wellsaidlabs.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
resemble.ai
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
descript.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
kits.ai
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
replicastudios.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
azure.microsoft.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
cloud.google.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
aws.amazon.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
openai.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
narakeet.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
listnr.ai
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
synthesys.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on ai voice generators, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer.
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence — different from being named.
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps.
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically.
Get your own ai voice generators brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about ai voice generators AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in the AI voice generators category?
ElevenLabs leads with a visibility score of 50.0% and a composite score of 42.5, far ahead of second-ranked Speechify at 22.5. Its visibility is 13 times the category average of 3.8%.
Which AI voice generator brand is most cited by Google AI Mode even though it isn't named as a top recommendation?
Speechify has the highest citation rate in the category at 75.0% despite a 0.0% visibility score, meaning its domain is used as a reference source without the brand being surfaced as a named recommendation.
What sources does Google AI Mode anchor on most when generating responses about AI voice generators?
The top cited sources are speechify.com, google.com, youtube.com, and reddit.com, alongside zapier.com and mashable.com, indicating a reliance on both brand domains and third-party editorial and user-generated content.
How concentrated is AI visibility in this category — is it winner-takes-most or evenly distributed?
It is heavily concentrated: ElevenLabs holds a 50.0% visibility score while the category average is 3.8%, and 7 of the top 10 ranked brands have 0.0% visibility scores.
Which brands are new entrants to AI visibility in this category based on the latest audit data?
ElevenLabs, Murf, and Typecast all moved from 0.0% to their current visibility scores in the most recent period, with ElevenLabs recording the largest delta at +50.0 percentage points.
Is there any brand in the AI voice generators category where visibility and citation are completely misaligned?
Yes — Speechify (0.0% visibility, 75.0% citation) and Typecast (12.5% visibility, 0.0% citation) represent the two extremes of misalignment between being named in responses and being used as a cited source.