AI video generators: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank ai video generators by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. AI video generation tools used to create synthetic video, talking-head content, visual explainers, ads, and short-form media from prompts or scripts. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jun 10, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
InVideo and Canva share the top two positions with identical composite scores of 12.5, the maximum recorded in this audit, while the category average sits at just 3.8. This means the two leaders are scoring 3.3x the category average, and both achieve this across visibility and citation simultaneously — a combination no other brand in the top 10 replicates. The gap between rank 2 and rank 3 in composite score is 3.7 points, marking a structurally significant tier break at the very top of the category.
A clear divergence exists between being named and being trusted with a citation link. Runway, Pika, VEED, and Colossyan all achieve 12.5% visibility — identical to the leaders — yet record 0.0% citation rate, producing composite scores of 8.8. Conversely, Synthesia, HeyGen, Visla, and Filmora register 0.0% visibility but each hold 12.5% citation rates, yielding composite scores of 3.8. This split indicates Google AI Mode is referencing some brands descriptively without linking them, while citing others as sources without surfacing them in named responses.
Google AI Mode is the top engine for every brand in this audit without exception, indicating the data is essentially single-engine in scope. The cited sources anchoring AI responses are predominantly third-party aggregators and community platforms — youtube.com, reddit.com, zapier.com, and openart.ai lead the list — rather than brand-owned domains. Platforms like mootion.com, hedra.com, and elements.envato.com also appear as cited sources, suggesting Google AI Mode is drawing on roundup and comparison content rather than primary brand documentation.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
InVideo 0% → 12% · rank #0 → #1+12pp
-
Canva 0% → 12% · rank #0 → #2+12pp
-
Runway 0% → 12% · rank #0 → #3+12pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
invideo.io
|
12% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
InVideo is one of only two brands achieving 12.5% on both visibility and citation, giving it a composite score 3.3x the 3.8 category average with no gap between being named and linked. |
||||
| 2 |
canva.com
|
12% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Canva matches InVideo exactly at 12.5% visibility and 12.5% citation, sharing the top composite score of 12.5 and standing as the only non-specialist design tool to reach this tier. |
||||
| 3 |
runwayml.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Runway holds 12.5% visibility — level with the leaders — but records 0.0% citation, dropping its composite to 8.8 and illustrating the named-but-not-cited pattern common to ranks 3 through 6. |
||||
| 4 |
pika.art
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Pika mirrors Runway with 12.5% visibility and 0.0% citation for a composite of 8.8, indicating Google AI Mode names it in responses but does not use its domain as a sourced reference. |
||||
| 5 |
veed.io
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
VEED sits in the same 8.8 composite band as Runway and Pika — 12.5% visibility, 0.0% citation — confirming a consistent ceiling for brands that are described but not linked by Google AI Mode. |
||||
| 6 |
colossyan.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
synthesia.io
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
heygen.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
visla.us
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
wondershare.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
luma.ai
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
descript.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
d-id.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
deepbrain.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
elai.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
steve.ai
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
fliki.ai
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
kapwing.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
hourone.ai
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
synthesys.io
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on ai video generators, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer.
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence — different from being named.
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps.
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically.
Get your own ai video generators brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about ai video generators AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in the AI video generators category?
InVideo and Canva jointly lead with composite scores of 12.5 — 3.3x the category average of 3.8 — and are the only brands achieving both 12.5% visibility and 12.5% citation simultaneously.
What is the average AI visibility score for brands in this category?
Both average visibility and average citation sit at 3.8%, meaning the top-ranked brands are performing more than three times above the category norm.
Which brands are named by AI but not cited as sources?
Runway, Pika, VEED, and Colossyan all reach 12.5% visibility but record 0.0% citation, meaning Google AI Mode mentions them in responses without linking their domains as references.
Which brands are cited by AI but not surfaced in named responses?
Synthesia, HeyGen, Visla, and Filmora each hold 12.5% citation rates but 0.0% visibility scores, indicating their domains appear as source links without the brands being named in AI-generated answers.
What sources does Google AI Mode anchor on for AI video generator research?
The top cited sources are youtube.com, reddit.com, zapier.com, and openart.ai, alongside smaller platforms like mootion.com, hedra.com, and elements.envato.com — predominantly third-party aggregators rather than brand-owned domains.
Which engine dominates AI visibility data in this category?
Google AI Mode is the recorded top engine for every single brand in the audit, making this dataset effectively single-engine with no comparative data from other AI answer platforms.