Top 20 ai code assistants by AI search visibility (2026)
AI developer tools used to autocomplete code, generate functions, explain repositories, fix bugs, and accelerate software development workflows. Ranked by a composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jun 08, 2026At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
Augment Code leads the AI code assistants category with a composite score of 47.5, more than double GitHub Copilot's 21.2 and nearly triple Cursor's 17.5. The gap is driven primarily by citation rate: Augment Code is cited in 100% of responses where it appears, versus 12.5% for GitHub Copilot and 0% for Cursor. With the category average visibility at just 3.8%, only three brands clear even 25% visibility, meaning the top three effectively own all measurable AI presence in this space.
The data reveals a sharp divergence between visibility and citation. Cursor matches Augment Code and GitHub Copilot on visibility at 25% but holds a 0% citation rate, meaning it is named in AI responses without its sources being referenced. Meanwhile, Gemini Code Assist and Qodo carry 0% visibility yet each achieve 12.5% citation rates, indicating Google AI Mode references their content without prominently featuring the brand by name. This named-but-not-trusted versus trusted-but-not-named split is a defining structural pattern in this category.
Google AI Mode is the sole top engine recorded across all 20 brands in this audit, confirming the category's AI visibility landscape is entirely anchored on a single engine. The top cited sources include youtube.com, augmentcode.com, medium.com, reddit.com, and linkedin.com, alongside niche review and tutorial domains like learn.g2.com, uibakery.io, and pinggy.io. The presence of augmentcode.com in the cited sources list directly explains that brand's 100% citation rate and reinforces its structural advantage in how Google AI Mode constructs answers in this category.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Augment Code 0% → 25% · rank #0 → #1+25pp
-
GitHub Copilot 0% → 25% · rank #0 → #2+25pp
-
Cursor 0% → 25% · rank #0 → #3+25pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
augmentcode.com
|
25% | 100% | Google AI Mode |
Augment Code leads with a composite score of 47.5 and a 100% citation rate, making it the only brand whose domain directly anchors Google AI Mode responses in this category. |
||||
| 2 |
github.com
|
25% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
GitHub Copilot matches Augment Code's 25% visibility but converts only 12.5% of appearances into citations, yielding a composite score of 21.2 versus Augment Code's 47.5. |
||||
| 3 |
cursor.com
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Cursor reaches 25% visibility — equal to the top two brands — but records a 0% citation rate, meaning Google AI Mode names it without ever sourcing its content. |
||||
| 4 |
cloud.google.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Gemini Code Assist achieves 0% visibility yet a 12.5% citation rate, placing it in the same composite score tier as Qodo at 3.8, despite being a Google-owned product. |
||||
| 5 |
qodo.ai
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Qodo mirrors Gemini Code Assist exactly with 0% visibility, 12.5% citation rate, and a composite score of 3.8, sharing the same domain as CodiumAI at qodo.ai. |
||||
| 6 |
qodo.ai
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
tabnine.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
windsurf.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
aws.amazon.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
replit.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
sourcegraph.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
jetbrains.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
continue.dev
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
codegeex.cn
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
pieces.app
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
askcodi.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
mutable.ai
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
blackbox.ai
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
codeium.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
marscode.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on ai code assistants, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer.
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence — different from being named.
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps.
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically.
Get your own ai code assistants brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about ai code assistants AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in the AI code assistants category?
Augment Code leads with a composite score of 47.5 and 100% citation rate, far ahead of GitHub Copilot at 21.2 and Cursor at 17.5. Only these three brands hold any meaningful visibility, all tied at 25% against a category average of 3.8%.
What sources does Google AI Mode cite most when answering queries about AI code assistants?
The top cited sources are youtube.com, augmentcode.com, medium.com, reddit.com, and linkedin.com, with niche tutorial and review sites like learn.g2.com, uibakery.io, and pinggy.io also appearing. The presence of augmentcode.com in this list directly explains that brand's 100% citation rate.
Which brands are visible in AI responses but not cited as sources?
Cursor has 25% visibility but a 0% citation rate, meaning Google AI Mode mentions it by name without referencing its domain as a source. This makes it the clearest example of a named-but-not-trusted brand in this audit.
Are there AI code assistant brands that get cited without being named in AI responses?
Yes — Gemini Code Assist and Qodo each hold 0% visibility but 12.5% citation rates, indicating Google AI Mode uses their content as source material without prominently naming them in responses.
How concentrated is AI visibility in the AI code assistants category?
Extremely concentrated: only 3 of 20 brands exceed 0% visibility, all sitting at exactly 25%, while the remaining 17 brands have zero visibility and the category average is just 3.8%.
Which engine dominates AI visibility for AI code assistants, and does any brand perform better on alternative engines?
Google AI Mode is the only engine recorded across all 20 brands in this audit, with every brand listing it as their top engine. There is no data in this audit indicating any brand outperforms on an alternative engine.