AI agent platforms: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank ai agent platforms by visibility and citations. 20 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. AI agent platforms used to build autonomous workflows, orchestrate tools, manage memory, and deploy task-oriented agents for operations and customer use cases. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
When buyers ask AI engines about AI agent platforms, Lindy consistently leads the conversation. Holding a visibility percentage of 25.0, Lindy is often cited for its influential role in the market. Other notable brands like Dust and n8n also appear frequently in discussions, indicating their relevance and impact in the AI agent landscape.
The rankings reflect a combination of direct brand citations and the credibility of popular sources. Lindy.ai, gumloop.com, and widespread community-driven platforms like Reddit are among the most referenced domains. This suggests that AI engines rely heavily on both authoritative brand content and aggregate reviews, providing a comprehensive view of each brand's standing.
Buyers evaluating options on this page should consider the emphasis AI engines place on recent reviews and third-party validation. Brands highly regarded by sources like YouTube or Reddit may offer robust community support and engagement. These attributes showcase topical authority in specific subcategories, guiding informed decision-making for choosing the right AI agent platform.
At a glance
What we observed in this category
Lindy holds the top composite score at 32.5, built on a 50.0% citation rate that no other brand in the top 10 comes close to matching. Dust sits second with a higher raw visibility of 37.5% but zero citations, giving it a composite of 26.2. That 6.3-point composite gap between first and second place reflects how heavily citation weight pulls the final ranking, and it means Lindy's authority signal is qualitatively different from Dust's mere presence in AI-generated responses.
The visibility-to-citation divergence is stark across this category. Dust, n8n, CrewAI, Flowise, and Botpress all register zero citation rates despite positive visibility scores, meaning Google AI Mode names them but does not anchor responses with links to their domains. Zapier and Kore.ai show the opposite pattern, with 0.0% visibility but 12.5% citation each, indicating the AI references their content as a source without surfacing them as named platforms in category overviews.
Google AI Mode is the dominant engine across all 10 ranked brands, with no outlier engine recorded for any single brand. The top cited sources list is anchored by lindy.ai and then shifts to third-party or community properties: gumloop.com, reddit.com, youtube.com, vybe.build, make.com, siit.io, and fast.io. This pattern suggests Google AI Mode is drawing heavily on community and comparison-style content rather than exclusively on vendor-owned documentation when generating answers in this category.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Dust 12% → 38% · rank #9 → #2+25pp
-
Lindy 12% → 25% · rank #2 → #1+12pp
-
Botpress 0% → 12% · rank #18 → #6+12pp
Biggest visibility fallers
-
Zapier 12% → 0% · rank #7 → #7-12pp
-
LangChain 12% → 0% · rank #3 → #9-12pp
-
OpenAI 12% → 0% · rank #6 → #11-12pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
lindy.ai
|
25% | 50% | Google AI Mode |
Lindy leads with a 50.0% citation rate, 13 times the category average of 3.8%, and is the only top-10 brand whose own domain appears in the top cited sources list. |
||||
| 2 |
dust.tt
|
38% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Dust has the highest raw visibility at 37.5%, more than six times the 6.2% category average, but its zero citation rate prevents it from converting that presence into composite leadership. |
||||
| 3 |
n8n.io
|
25% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
n8n matches Lindy's 25.0% visibility score but holds zero citations, producing a composite of 17.5 compared to Lindy's 32.5, a gap driven entirely by citation performance. |
||||
| 4 |
crewai.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
CrewAI sits at 12.5% visibility and zero citations, sharing an identical composite score of 8.8 with Flowise and Botpress, offering no differentiating signal from those peers. |
||||
| 5 |
flowiseai.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Flowise is statistically indistinguishable from CrewAI and Botpress at rank 5, with the same 12.5% visibility, 0.0% citation rate, and composite score of 8.8 across all three. |
||||
| 6 |
botpress.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
zapier.com
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
kore.ai
|
0% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
langchain.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
microsoft.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
openai.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
llamaindex.ai
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
google.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
aws.amazon.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
cognigy.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
moveworks.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
pydantic.dev
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
relevanceai.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 19 |
dify.ai
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 20 |
voiceflow.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on ai agent platforms, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer. More on visibility →
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence, different from being named. More on citation rate →
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps. How AI engines pick sources →
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically. How AI search ranking works →
Get your own ai agent platforms brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about ai agent platforms AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in the AI agent platforms category?
Lindy leads with a composite score of 32.5, driven by a 50.0% citation rate that is the highest in the top 10 and the only brand whose domain appears in the top cited sources list.
Which brand has the highest raw visibility but lowest citation rate among top-ranked platforms?
Dust has the highest visibility at 37.5% but a citation rate of 0.0%, meaning Google AI Mode surfaces it frequently in responses but does not cite its domain as a source.
What sources does Google AI Mode cite most for AI agent platform research?
The top cited sources are lindy.ai followed by third-party and community properties including gumloop.com, reddit.com, youtube.com, vybe.build, make.com, siit.io, and fast.io.
Which brands have seen the biggest visibility gains in this category?
Botpress rose 12 rank positions from 18 to 6, Dust jumped from rank 9 to rank 2 with a visibility delta of plus 25.0%, and Lindy added 12.5 visibility points while also gaining 25.0 citation points.
Are any major platforms losing AI visibility in this category?
LangChain dropped from rank 3 to rank 9 with visibility falling to 0.0%, and OpenAI fell from rank 6 to rank 11 with the same 12.5% visibility loss, both now scoring zero on composite.
How does the average brand in this category perform on visibility and citation?
The category average is 6.2% visibility and 3.8% citation across 20 tracked brands, indicating that most platforms have minimal presence in Google AI Mode responses.