Access review software: AI search visibility ranking (2026)
How AI search engines rank access review software by visibility and citations. 18 brands measured monthly across Google AI Mode: which brands the AI names in answers, which domains it cites as sources, and how the leaders compare. Access review software used to audit entitlements, certify user permissions, and reduce identity sprawl across cloud and enterprise systems. Composite score: 70% visibility (% of AI answers naming the brand) + 30% citation rate (% citing the brand's domain). Full methodology →
Refreshed Jun 19, 2026Download this ranking as a PDF
We'll email it to you. One-off send — no list, no follow-up, no surprise marketing.
At a glance
What we observed in this categoryauto-generated
Lumos holds the top rank in the access review software category with a composite score of 12.5, the only brand where visibility and citation are perfectly aligned at 12.5% each. ConductorOne matches Lumos on visibility at 12.5% but records zero citation, producing a lower composite of 8.8. Every other brand in the top 10, including established vendors like SailPoint, Okta, and Microsoft Entra ID Governance, scores 0.0 across all metrics. The category average visibility sits at just 1.4%, making the gap between Lumos and the field unusually sharp for an 18-brand category.
The divergence between visibility and citation is most pronounced with Veza, which records 0.0% visibility but 25.0% citation, the highest citation figure in the dataset. This means Google AI Mode references Veza as a source or authority without surfacing it as a named brand in responses. ConductorOne presents the opposite pattern: fully visible at 12.5% but never cited. These two brands illustrate that being named in AI responses and being trusted as a reference are distinct and not correlated outcomes in this category.
Google AI Mode is the top engine for every brand in this dataset, indicating the audit is concentrated on a single engine. The top cited sources are third-party and community domains including securends.com, getsecureslate.com, reddit.com, and cloudeagle.ai, alongside vendor-adjacent sites like vanta.com and pathlock.com. None of these cited sources are the primary domains of the top-ranked brands themselves, suggesting AI responses in this category draw heavily on review, community, and comparison content rather than vendor-owned pages.
Movers & shakers since last refresh
Biggest visibility risers
-
Lumos 0% → 12% · rank #0 → #1+12pp
-
ConductorOne 0% → 12% · rank #0 → #2+12pp
The ranking
| # | Brand | Visibility | Citation | Top engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
lumos.com
|
12% | 12% | Google AI Mode |
Lumos is the only brand with matched visibility and citation both at 12.5%, placing it well above the category average visibility of 1.4% and ahead of all 17 competitors. |
||||
| 2 |
conductorone.com
|
12% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
ConductorOne shares Lumos's 12.5% visibility score but records 0.0% citation, producing a composite of 8.8 and signalling it is named but not referenced as an authoritative source. |
||||
| 3 |
veza.com
|
0% | 25% | Google AI Mode |
Veza achieves the highest citation rate in the category at 25.0% despite 0.0% visibility, meaning AI cites it as a source without including it in named brand recommendations. |
||||
| 4 |
sailpoint.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
SailPoint registers 0.0% on all three metrics despite being a major identity governance vendor, indicating no measurable AI Mode presence in this specific category query set. |
||||
| 5 |
saviynt.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Saviynt, like SailPoint, scores 0.0% across visibility, citation, and composite, sharing the same absence from AI Mode responses as six other brands ranked below it. |
||||
| 6 |
microsoft.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 7 |
okta.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 8 |
oneidentity.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 9 |
cyberark.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 10 |
ibm.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 11 |
omadaidentity.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 12 |
rsa.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 13 |
oracle.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 14 |
delinea.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 15 |
pingidentity.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 16 |
opal.dev
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 17 |
zluri.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
| 18 |
eviden.com
|
0% | 0% | Google AI Mode |
Sources AI engines trust in this category
Across the 8 buyer-intent queries we ran on access review software, these are the domains Google AI Mode cited most often. If you're not on this list — or if your competitors are — that's a concrete PR / linkbuilding target.
How to read this ranking
Four things worth knowing before you act on the numbers above. These are the same definitions across every industry page — for category-specific observations, see the What we observed section above (where available) and the per-brand insights inline in the ranking.
Visibility = being named
A brand's visibility % is the share of AI answers that mention it by name in the response prose. This is who AI engines actively recommend to the buyer.
Citation rate = being trusted
Citation rate is the share of AI answers that include the brand's domain as a clickable source link. This is what the AI treats as authoritative evidence — different from being named.
Top engine differs by brand
The "top engine" column shows which AI surface each brand performs best on. Big gaps between a brand's score across engines usually points to specific content or schema gaps.
Rankings move month to month
AI engines re-crawl and re-rank on shorter cycles than classical search. We re-audit every brand on this list at least every 30 days and refresh this page automatically.
Get your own access review software brand audited
The brands above were curated from public market-leader lists. Want the same measurement against your own brand — including the queries you appear on, which competitors get named instead, and a prioritised fix list? Run a free preview.
Frequently asked about access review software AI visibility
Who leads AI visibility in access review software?
Lumos leads with a composite score of 12.5 and matching visibility and citation both at 12.5%, the highest aligned scores in the category. ConductorOne is the only other brand with measurable visibility, also at 12.5%.
Which brand is most cited by Google AI Mode in this category even without visibility?
Veza holds a 25.0% citation rate despite 0.0% visibility, making it the most-cited brand in the dataset. This suggests AI draws on Veza content as a reference without surfacing it as a recommended product.
What sources does AI cite most for access review software research?
The top cited sources include securends.com, getsecureslate.com, reddit.com, cloudeagle.ai, and vanta.com. None are the primary domains of the top-ranked vendors, pointing to third-party and community content as the dominant reference base.
How do major enterprise vendors like SailPoint and Okta perform in AI visibility for this category?
SailPoint, Okta, Microsoft Entra ID Governance, CyberArk, and IBM all score 0.0% on visibility, citation, and composite. Despite their market presence, they have no measurable footprint in Google AI Mode responses for this category.
How fragmented is AI visibility across the 18 brands in this category?
The category average visibility is just 1.4%, and only two of 18 brands, Lumos and ConductorOne, record any visibility at all. The category is highly concentrated with the top two brands accounting for all named visibility.
Are there any brands that have recently entered AI visibility in this category?
Both Lumos and ConductorOne are flagged as the biggest visibility risers, each moving from 0.0% to 12.5% visibility. No brands recorded a visibility decline in the same period.