Free previewWP Manta
AI answer visibility audit
WP Manta appears in Google AI search — but who else is being cited?
Future customers now use AI to help answer their questions. Find out who is being recommended and how your business performs. This preview shows whether Google's AI Mode names WP Manta, cites the site, or sends attention to competitors instead.
Google's AI named WP Manta in 5 of 8 answers in this preview. The full audit expands this to the major AI engines and turns the findings into a practical action plan.
The takeaway
WP Manta shows up in Google AI answers — now check whether the other engines agree.
62.5% visibility means 5 of 8 answers named WP Manta directly.
The full report unlocks 4 more AI engines, 32 more queries, hallucination detection, competitor analysis and prioritised fixes.
Your Google AI Overview snapshot
A fast read on whether Google names WP Manta, links to wpmanta.com, or relies on competing sources.
Visibility
62.5%
of answers named WP Manta
Citation rate
62.5%
of answers linked to WP Manta
Competitors cited
0.0
average per question
Questions tested
8
free preview sample
Choose an AI engine to inspect visibility
Google is available in the free preview. The paid audit compares ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini using the same scoring model.
Available now
Google AI Mode visibility
Visibility62.5%
Citation rate62.5%
Queries8
Competitors0.0
What this means
Google AI Mode named WP Manta in 5 of 8 tested answers.
The full audit shows whether that is a Google-specific issue or an AI-wide discovery gap.
Brand questionstested
Category questionstested
Problem-led questionstested
Comparison questionsfull audit
Locked
Chatgpt visibility data
See whether Chatgpt recommends WP Manta
The full audit captures answers, citations, sentiment, competitors and hallucination flags for this engine.
- Brand inclusion by query type
- Competitors named in the same response
- Evidence and content opportunities
Locked
Claude visibility data
See whether Claude recommends WP Manta
The full audit captures answers, citations, sentiment, competitors and hallucination flags for this engine.
- Brand inclusion by query type
- Competitors named in the same response
- Evidence and content opportunities
Locked
Perplexity visibility data
See whether Perplexity recommends WP Manta
The full audit captures answers, citations, sentiment, competitors and hallucination flags for this engine.
- Brand inclusion by query type
- Competitors named in the same response
- Evidence and content opportunities
Locked
Gemini visibility data
See whether Gemini recommends WP Manta
The full audit captures answers, citations, sentiment, competitors and hallucination flags for this engine.
- Brand inclusion by query type
- Competitors named in the same response
- Evidence and content opportunities
Competitor and source intelligence
The preview shows early source patterns. The full audit reveals the recurring competitors, domains and page types shaping AI answers.
Competitors Google cited or named
No competitors were detected in this 8-query sample.
Where Google's AI gets its answers
Technical AEO/GEO foundations
The first 3 checks are visible in the preview. The remaining checks are blurred and unlock in the full audit.
01
AI bots allowed in robots.txt
pass- Check
- AI bots allowed in robots.txt
- Expected
- robots.txt either doesn't exist (everything allowed) or explicitly allows GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended.
- Why it matters
- If your robots.txt blocks these bots, AI engines literally cannot read your site. No amount of content optimisation can recover from this — it's a hard ceiling.
- How you scored
- All 12 AI crawlers allowed — robots.txt doesn't block any of the major AI crawlers (GPTBot, ChatGPT-User, OAI-SearchBot, ClaudeBot, anthropic-ai, Claude-Web, PerplexityBot, Perplexity-User, Google-Extended, Googlebot, cohere-ai, Bytespider).
02
Sitemap.xml present and reachable
warn- Check
- Sitemap.xml present and reachable
- Expected
- /sitemap.xml is reachable, returns valid XML, and lists key product/category pages with <lastmod> dates.
- Why it matters
- Without a sitemap, AI crawlers may never discover deep pages — they prioritise sitemap-listed URLs. Stale or missing <lastmod> dates also cause AI engines to assume content is out of date.
- How you scored
- Sitemap returned HTTP 403 — The sitemap URL is reachable but returned a non-success status. AI crawlers may skip it.
- How to fix
- Verify the sitemap is publicly accessible at /sitemap.xml.
03
llms.txt file published
fail- Check
- llms.txt file published
- Expected
- An /llms.txt file at the site root, summarising the site's purpose, key pages and citation-friendly facts in plain markdown.
- Why it matters
- llms.txt is the emerging standard for AI-readable site summaries. It's the single highest-leverage file you can publish — most sites don't have one yet, and it gives AI engines a curated, low-noise overview of what to cite.
- How you scored
- No llms.txt found — The /llms.txt file isn't published. Most sites haven't done this yet — early movers get a citation advantage.
- How to fix
- Create a markdown file at /llms.txt with this structure: # Your Brand Name > One-sentence description. ## Key pages - [Pricing](/pricing): brief description - [Product](/product): brief description ## About Plain-language facts AI engines can cite directly.
04
Organization schema present
Locked in preview- Check
- Organization schema present
- Expected
- An Organization or LocalBusiness JSON-LD block on the homepage with name, url and description.
- Why it matters
- Organization schema is how AI engines reliably identify your brand as an entity. Without it, the AI may conflate you with similar-named businesses or fail to associate your domain with your brand.
- How you scored
- No Organization schema — No Organization or LocalBusiness JSON-LD found on the homepage.Unlock score →
05
FAQPage schema present
Locked in preview- Check
- FAQPage schema present
- Expected
- FAQPage schema on at least one page (typically /pricing, /faq, or product pages with Q&A content).
- Why it matters
- FAQ-formatted content gets pulled into Google AI Overviews ~4× more often than buried prose. FAQPage schema is what tells the AI 'these are buyer questions and answers'.
- How you scored
- No FAQPage schema — No FAQPage JSON-LD found on the homepage. If you have a /faq or /pricing page with question content, it should publish FAQPage schema.Unlock score →
06
Product/Service schema present
Locked in preview- Check
- Product/Service schema present
- Expected
- Product or Service schema if you sell anything — with name, description and price/Offer.
- Why it matters
- Product schema enables rich product cards in search and gives AI engines structured pricing and availability data they can quote directly.
- How you scored
- No Product/Service schema — No Product, Service or SoftwareApplication schema found. If you sell anything, this is a major missed signal.Unlock score →
07
Meta description on homepage
Locked in preview- Check
- Meta description on homepage
- Expected
- A concise, accurate <meta name="description"> on every page (~120–160 characters).
- Why it matters
- AI engines often quote the meta description verbatim when summarising your page. A missing or generic description = the AI invents one (or skips you).
- How you scored
- Missing — The homepage has no <meta name="description"> tag.Unlock score →
08
Open Graph tags complete
Locked in preview- Check
- Open Graph tags complete
- Expected
- og:title, og:description, og:image and og:url tags on every page.
- Why it matters
- Some AI engines fall back to Open Graph data when JSON-LD is missing. OG tags also control how your links appear when shared on Slack, Twitter, LinkedIn — which compounds inbound traffic.
- How you scored
- No Open Graph tags — The homepage has no Open Graph metadata.Unlock score →
09
Twitter Card tag present
Locked in preview- Check
- Twitter Card tag present
- Expected
- twitter:card meta tag (typically 'summary_large_image') so links render properly when shared.
- Why it matters
- Twitter Card tags compound social discovery, which compounds the citations AI engines value. Skipping this is leaving easy distribution on the table.
- How you scored
- Missing — No twitter:card meta tag found. Links shared to Twitter/X will render as plain URLs.Unlock score →
10
Canonical URL declared
Locked in preview- Check
- Canonical URL declared
- Expected
- A <link rel="canonical"> tag on every page pointing to the canonical URL.
- Why it matters
- Without canonical tags, AI engines can index multiple URL variants of the same page (with/without trailing slash, with/without tracking params). That dilutes the citation signal across duplicates.
- How you scored
- Missing — No canonical link element found on the homepage.Unlock score →
11
Single, descriptive H1 on homepage
Locked in preview- Check
- Single, descriptive H1 on homepage
- Expected
- Exactly one <h1> per page. Bonus if it's question-shaped or a sharp claim — AI engines extract headings as topic boundaries.
- Why it matters
- LLMs use heading hierarchy to extract topic boundaries when summarising. Pages with multiple H1s confuse the parser; pages with no H1 don't appear topical.
- How you scored
- No H1 found — The homepage has no <h1> tag. AI engines will struggle to identify the page's primary topic.Unlock score →
12
Critical content is server-rendered
Locked in preview- Check
- Critical content is server-rendered
- Expected
- Critical content is in server-rendered HTML — not loaded by JavaScript after page load.
- Why it matters
- Most AI crawlers don't execute JavaScript. SPAs that render content client-side appear as blank pages to the AI. This is the #1 silent killer of AEO for React/Vue/Angular sites without SSR.
- How you scored
- 2763% of content visible without JS — AI crawlers see ~995 words of 36 words on the homepage. Server-rendered.Unlock score →
13
Mobile viewport meta tag
Locked in preview- Check
- Mobile viewport meta tag
- Expected
- <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"> for mobile responsiveness.
- Why it matters
- Most AI crawlers default to a mobile user-agent. Without a viewport meta, they may treat the site as desktop-only and downrank it for mobile-first queries.
- How you scored
- Missing — No mobile viewport meta tag.Unlock score →
14
Site served over HTTPS
Locked in preview- Check
- Site served over HTTPS
- Expected
- The domain serves over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
- Why it matters
- AI engines, like browsers, downrank or skip insecure pages. HTTP-only domains are essentially invisible to most modern crawlers.
- How you scored
- HTTPS — Site serves over HTTPS.Unlock score →
15
Homepage response time
Locked in preview- Check
- Homepage response time
- Expected
- Initial HTML response < 1500ms — fast enough that AI crawlers don't time out.
- Why it matters
- AI crawlers run on tight per-page budgets. Slow pages get partial-rendered or skipped entirely, especially during high-traffic crawl windows.
- How you scored
- Fast (131 ms) — The homepage responded quickly. AI crawlers will fetch easily.Unlock score →
What unlocks in the full audit
The paid report turns the free snapshot into a full evidence base and action plan.
Engine heatmap — how 5 engines compare
| Query type | ChatGPT | Claude | Perplexity | Gemini | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| brand | 64% | 57% | 71% | 78% | 62.5% |
| category | 21% | 29% | 43% | 36% | 18% |
| comparison | 14% | 22% | 35% | 19% | 9% |
Hallucination report — what AI is making up
| Engine | Query | Flag |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | Sample pricing query | Unsupported claim about eligibility |
| Claude | Sample competitor query | Incorrect product comparison |
Sample query evidence
One expandable sample from the preview. The full audit includes every query and every engine response.
What is WP Manta? Google AI
WPManta (wpmanta.com) is a professional WordPress agency and service provider that specializes in website management, ongoing maintenance plans, and custom development.
Rather than a specific software, plugin, or theme, WPManta functions as a technical support and retainer service for businesses using WordPress. Their core offerings include:
(Note: If you were instead thinking of a DIY WordPress theme with a similar name, you might be looking for Mantra by Cryout Creations, a popular responsive multi-option theme available on WordPress.org).
Are you looking for help fixing a specific WordPress issue, or are you trying to compare maintenance services for your site? Let me know and I can point you in the right direction.
Citations:
1. Custom WordPress Website Design & Development Services (wpmanta.com)
2. WordPress Website Maintenance Services and Support Plans (wpmanta.com)
3. Mantra | WordPress Theme | WordPress.org (wordpress.org)
Turn the preview into a fix list.
Go beyond the Google-only snapshot — see how the AI engines that actually matter to your buyers describe you, and get the action plan to fix it.
One-off audit
Two Engine Audit
$29once
The two engines most buyers actually use.
- Google AI Overviews + ChatGPT
- 40 buyer-facing queries (80 AI answers)
- Competitor share-of-voice (text + citations)
- Engine heatmap by query type
- Top cited sources (PR target list)
- Hallucination flags + accuracy check
- 15-check technical GEO audit
- Prioritised action plan
- CSV export from your dashboard
- Re-run any time from the dashboard
Most useful
Full audit
$79once
Every AI engine your buyers might ask. The complete one-off diagnosis.
- ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini & Google AI Overviews
- 40 queries × 5 engines = 200 AI answers
- Competitor share-of-voice (text + citations)
- Engine heatmap by query type
- Top cited sources (PR target list)
- Hallucination + accuracy second-pass scoring
- Sentiment analysis per engine
- 15-check technical GEO audit
- Prioritised action plan
- CSV export from your dashboard
- Re-run any time from the dashboard
Or track it monthly
Two Engine Monitoring
$35/mo
Watch the two engines most buyers use, every month.
- Includes the Two Engine Audit
- Google AI Overviews + ChatGPT
- Automatic monthly re-runs (1st of each month)
- 20 monitored buyer questions, editable any time
- Trend chart: visibility · citations · sentiment · accuracy · hallucinations
- Competitor share-of-voice tracked over time
- 1 extra manual run per month
- Unlimited brands on the same account
- Dashboard + email delivery
- Cancel anytime
Full monitoring
$95/mo
Track every AI engine continuously.
- Includes the Full Audit
- All 5 engines monitored monthly (200 AI answers/month)
- 40 monitored buyer questions, editable any time
- Per-engine trend charts: visibility · citation · sentiment · accuracy · hallucinations
- Competitor + source change tracking
- Action plan refreshed every month
- Hallucination + accuracy scoring on every run
- 1 extra manual run per month
- Unlimited brands + team invites
- Cancel anytime